Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CASTLE"
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit: Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Splitting the Baby: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Young v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, in which it struck down the federal-law provision of DOMA. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The following year, the Court held, in Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
In March 2013, the US District Court of California ruled that there was no copyright infringement. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, General Electric v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm
It began to lose steam with a 1969 court ruling, Norton v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Joseph Hilton f/k/a Joseph Yurkin, Pacific Northwestern Energy LLC, Rock Castle Drilling Fund LP, Rock Castle Drilling Fund II LP, and New Horizon Publishing Inc.Case number: 12-cv-81033 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida)Case filed: September 24, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 20, 2014 04/22/2014 07/21/2014 2014-37 SEC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Pa- tent No. 7,892,281 (“’281 patent”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Today, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
United States (1879) hung over the case of Brown v. [read post]
