Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. LOWE"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2014, 12:37 pm
But a funny thing happened on the way to appellate review in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
“We disclaim altogether any jurisdiction in the courts of the United States upon the subject of divorce. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
The district court granted that motion. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
While “agree[ing] with appellant that Telegraph Hill is outstanding and unique in a city of outstanding and unique places[,]” the First District Court of Appeal nonetheless affirmed the trial court’s order denying plaintiff/appellant neighborhood group’s mandamus petition challenging the City of San Francisco’s approval of a 3-unit condominium project there on CEQA and general plan consistency grounds. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
While “agree[ing] with appellant that Telegraph Hill is outstanding and unique in a city of outstanding and unique places[,]” the First District Court of Appeal nonetheless affirmed the trial court’s order denying plaintiff/appellant neighborhood group’s mandamus petition challenging the City of San Francisco’s approval of a 3-unit condominium project there on CEQA and general plan consistency grounds. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Ohio – September 12th, 2019) involves a slip and fall at a Lowe’s store located in South Lebanon, Ohio. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:21 am
Citing Mead Johnson & Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 10:23 am
Cricket Wireless, LLC, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently decertified a class because of a “critical” mistake in Plaintiff’s damages model that rendered it inadequate under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:02 am
United States, the Supreme Court debated the scope of tribal fishing rights under 19th century treaties between the United States and northwest Indian tribes. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:12 am
This does not imply, however, that a sentence of 21 months is unreasonably high; to the contrary, it strikes us as unreasonably low, and United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm
United States (Indian Health Service; Contract Support Costs) Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:41 am
The court can then construe the claims, Markman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether federal law prohibiting discrimination in the workplace applies to gay and transgender employees. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:49 pm
Yet both were done in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:53 am
SENTENCING/PLEA AGREEMENTUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
Shubb of the Eastern District of California issued an opinion denying certification in Quezada v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:24 pm
For example, the government prevailed in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
Tuition at SCIL is $350 per unit. [read post]
