Search for: "US v. Butterworth"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
alp v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Sweet and Maxwell and Butterworths, the latter having been born as recently as in 1818, at least to some extent, continue to use their historic names, despite Westlaw, Thomson Reuters, Lexis Nexis and RELX (the world’s largest publisher) and, certainly in their home markets, are still known by them to lawyers, law librarians and others. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:04 am
[57] In Barker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Pinsent Mason’s Out-Law.com site has a useful piece on the significance of the response for ISPs, which the government suggests could act as “liaison points” in defamation disputes. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Butterworth, 701 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1997); Johnston v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On Monday 12 March 2012 Sharp J gave a brief judgment in the case of British Pregnancy Advisory Service v The person using the alias “Pablo Escobar” – the case relating to the hacking of the claimant’s website ([2012] EWHC 572 (QB)). [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 1:29 am
This time the battle, noted briefly on the LexisNexis Butterworth service, was over disclosure of research data.Right: er, not THAT sort of Baxter Healthcare ...Briefly stated, Abbott and Baxter make sevoflurane-based anaesthetic products, administered using an anaesthetic vaporiser. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:06 am
Jones (eds) Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions (London, Butterworth Heinemann). ? [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
The case, if you want to google it, is James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:13 pm
(London: Butterworths, 1953), vol. 3, at 69, and to what was said by Finch C.J.B.C. in Brophy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
Today, it is a Model-T Ford, but people are used to using it, and have retained it for that reason. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
That said, I don’t think we need to get there yet: I think Savannah read the confidentiality statute correctly, and so tweeted only the names of the perpetrators, which she unquestionably had a right to do (Butterworth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
[footnote omitted] (original emphasis)Thereafter his Honour referred to the use of the word “knowingly” in civil proceedings with particular reference to that word in relation to the tort of deceit as discussed by the High Court in Magill v Magill (2006) 231 ALR 27. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Do lawyers and judges need a different kind of training from the traditional methods used in the past? [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The view of the learned editors of Duncan & Neill (Duncan and Neil on Defamation (Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2009), at 17.26. is that it can but the better view, which was assumed to be the case by at least two of their lordships in Reynolds (at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) is that it cannot. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
NASA couldn't build a Saturn V today. [read post]
