Search for: "US v. Diaz"
Results 81 - 100
of 862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 9:51 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:45 am
Diaz-Rodriguez, First Circuit: Appellant was convicted at trial of aiding and abetting interference with commerce by threats of violence and one count of using a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am
Last summer, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm
New Mexico (case no. 09-10876), a sequel to the 2009 case Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
If anyone has any intel, please let us know. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 11:53 am
On 25 June 2009, the Supremes issued a major criminal procedure case: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:41 pm
A friend o’ CAAFlog was kind enough to shoot us a copy today; here’s a link. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 11:51 am
The Supreme Court held this week in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Michigan law prof Richard Friedman summarizes the Melendez-Diaz case, and gives links to the particulars: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:01 pm
US v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Robinson, 414 US 218 (1973) and clothing (United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:21 am
Everyone agrees that it's illegal to "enter" the United States illegally after being deported. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:39 am
No, not according to Judge Diaz, who ruled as follows in a short Order in Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:44 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:35 am
In the Yukumoto v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:04 am
I've already noted that Briscoe is a very interesting follow-on to Melendez-Diaz about the use of forensic analysis reports at trial where the chemist is not called as a witness. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 7:45 am
US v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:58 pm
The introduction of the CHR violate defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford and under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
