Search for: "US v. Dorsey" Results 81 - 100 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:56 am
[Readers:  QQ # 103 was posed to my colleagues in Dorsey's Palo Alto office. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:25 pm
Because the motion was not supported by an affidavit made by someone with first-hand knowledge of what occurred, the request to end the case could not be granted.Seems to us like this defendant was caught with its pants down.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Dorsey v Les Sans Culottes [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
SmithKline Beecham Corp. – eligibility of “outside salesmen” of pharmaceutical companies for overtime pay Tues., April 17: 11-5683 — Dorsey v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am by Roy Ginsburg
• Second, the employer may develop a “targeted screen” based on three factors articulated in a 1975 Eighth Circuit decision, Green v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
  The petitioner in Dorsey v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am by Roy Ginsburg
[Readers:  My partner, Nick Akerman, who works in Dorsey's NYC office, wrote the article below. [read post]