Search for: "US v. Frederick"
Results 81 - 100
of 844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 9:51 am
The Virginia Supreme Court first recognized the common law tort of wrongful discharge in 1985 in the case of Bowman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Using personnel records in determining an appropriate disciplinary penaltyMassaria v Betschen, 290 A.D.2d 602In the Massaria case the Appellate Division was asked to determine if was appropriate for the Section 75 hearing officer to consider a disciplinary settlement agreement entered into by an employee and his or her employer to resolve an earlier disciplinary action involving the employee when determining the penalty to be imposed on the employee after he or she was found guilty… [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:31 am
Since, per the case of Este v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 10:44 pm
The Annexation Areas were zoned for agricultural uses or other low-intensity uses by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Sanders v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:00 am
#12: Bouchat v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
Frederick v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 7:15 pm
Frederick. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
Last week, the Court of Appeals of North Carolina decided State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 1:57 pm
Roger Falk won in State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
It is not for the witness to declare that the report was not used for his testimony; whether the report is useful to the defense is up to the defendant. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:13 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
This Article also explores Douglass’s constitutional theories and understandings and how he used the Constitution to oppose slavery. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:03 am
The trial agreed, ordering Continental to reimburse Kemper and pay its attorney fees, and Continental appealed.At issue was an exclusion in Continental's policy, which defined an "insured" under the policy to include "[a]nyone else while using with your permission a covered "auto" you own, hire or borrow except: * * * [y]our employee if the covered "auto" is owned by that employee or a member or his or her household. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:16 am
The context is Morse v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
See Detraz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:44 am
Frederick. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:59 am
Although denying Serrano's Restaurant's motion for sanctions against the EEOC, Judge Frederick J. [read post]
