Search for: "US v. Hancock"
Results 81 - 100
of 245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
IPSO Brian Cathcart has considered the status of IPSO in a post on Hacked Off, critiquing the regulator following comments by the Culture Secretary Matt Hancock seeking to affirm the effectiveness of the press regulator. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
This rarely used provision, previously in s.32(4) DPA 1998, was relied upon by Mr Justice Warby in a case just the day before DPA 2018 was commenced: Sube v News Group Newspapers & anor [2018] EWHC 1234 (QB) at [88] onwards. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm
However, when the matter went back to the House of Commons MP’s again voted against the amendment to implement Leveson Part Two, amid statements by Culture Secretary Mike Hancock offering to strengthen press regulation powers. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
“ Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the England (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaq only a provisional conclusion). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:32 am
Privacy Lives considers the data protection implications of the use of fitness apps. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:06 am
Ross, Short Circuit, on U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
The Socially aware blog uses the recent case of Herrick v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
Following statements by Culture Secretary Mike Hancock many news outlets have commented on the proposals to regulate children’s use of social media. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:38 am
Online harassment The PHA has been applied to various types of online publication including remarks on internet forums (Cray v Hancock [2005] All ER (D) 66 (Nov)); an internet-based campaign and spoof websites (Petros v Chaudhari [2004] All ER (D) 173 (Mar)); and the dissemination of naked images of the claimant (AMP v Persons Unknown ([2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC)). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am
For purposes of the statute of limitations, an attorney/client relationship cannot be revived after the limitations period has expired (see Droz v Karl, 736 F Supp 2d at 527 [applying New York law]; Maurice W Pomfrey & Assoc., Ltd. v Hancock & Estabrook,50 AD3d 1531, 1533 [4th Dept 2008]). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
Digital Minister Matt Hancock suggested that the bill was “liberal not libertarian”. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
Digital Minister Matt Hancock suggested that the bill was “liberal not libertarian”. [read post]
