Search for: "US v. Hughes"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,870
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
Hughes: could compare cases where they narrow the claim of the TM registration v. narrow the claim of the patent—Maker’s Mark case where they have a registration for a wax seal but claim only red. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 5:58 am
Here’s a brief summary of what you missed from the IPKat.IP GenerallyKatfriend Alessandro Cerri provided an update on the intellectual property-related aspects of the European Commission's recent communication of its strategy on Web 4.0 and virtual worlds.PatentsRose Hughes gave us a two-part analysis of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales decision in Sandoz v BMS and how it diverged from the EPO's approach to… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
No doubt they mean well and aren’t beholden to Access Copyright – but their opinions are so over the top and poorly informed that they have a very bad look:Kate Taylor, May 26, 2023 Hugh Stevens, July 15, 2023 Hugh Steven’s opinion piece conveniently follows up just two days later on the announcement by Access Copyright (“AC”) that it was downsizing and restructuring. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
As regards terminology, the Court used the term “delisting” to refer to measures taken by search engine operators, and the term “de-indexing” to denote measures put in place by the news publisher responsible for the website on which the article in question is archived [175] . [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
The full judgement (Smith v Backhouse [2023] [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
”Expert Statement Jared Holt (Resident Fellow, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Atlantic Council) Expert Statement Brian Hughes (Associate Director, Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University)Expert Statement Aziz Huq (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School) and Tom Ginsburg (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School)“Statement on the January 6, 2021 Attacks and the Threat to American Democracy”Expert… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am
Over at Balkinization, an interesting conversation is unfolding on the uses of history in Supreme Court decisionmaking, especially as pertains to the recent Haaland v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
Use in content moderation—deciding what to take down—v. using in recommendation—do you have to guard against addiction in recommendation? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Journalism that tells people only what they want to hear is a known risk; so are there uses of data which you must not make? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:11 am
Humans v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
Christophe Geiger: different EU/US traditions around regulatory oversight/verification of compliance with key values v private ordering. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
Geographical indications Anastasiia Kyrylenko commented on a recent Paris First Instance Court decision regarding the “Piment D’Espelette” (Espelette pepper) PDO and whether there was infringement when the PDO was used in a domain name. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:45 am
Bradley Hester originally brought the case Hester v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
This approach is consistent with existing case law.Rose mentioned that the recent US Supreme Court decision Amgen v Sanofi (No. 21-757) was also a good decision. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 7:40 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:36 am
Students, faculty, and staff are assured of participation in University programs and in the use of facilities without such discrimination. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
TINA specifically prohibits a contractor from claiming the Government’s price would not have decreased because the procurement was sole source or the contractor otherwise had superior bargaining power.[16] A contractor also cannot claim the Contracting Officer should have known the data were defective even though the contractor took no affirmative action to inform the Contracting Officer the data were defective.[17] A contractor cannot claim the price would not change because the parties… [read post]
