Search for: "US v. Michael Harmon"
Results 81 - 93
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
Elizabeth Harmon, University of Michigan, “‘A New Species of Corporation’: What the Legal Creation of Philanthropic Foundations can tell us about the Development of American Capitalism. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
”[14] The bill specifies that the standards developed by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures must be used.[15] Company reports would also have to be verified by qualified third-party auditors. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Among the most innovative alternatives being developed is the cooperative, which has the potential to develop into a useful form of what this Article calls a proletarian corporation. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
In this article, opportunities to use empirical methods to study possible bias in investment arbitration are surveyed. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Governor Ravitch brings to his position will benefit us all. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Had different instincts about copyrightable works created as logos v. use of Snoopy, created for other purposes, then transferred into TM by licensing. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
,” citing Utah v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
The SEC also provided guidance on the use of projections generally in SEC filings and specifically in de-SPAC transactions. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The Celanese plant, a sprawling complex on the banks of the New River between Narrows and Pearisburg, makes materials used for cigarette filters and other products. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
