Search for: "US v. Monell" Results 81 - 93 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm by Jeff Welty
” As I understand the latter type of system, the system does not look at a defined set of events using fixed thresholds. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:53 am by SHG
Unfortunately, the state of the law is that to hold Chicago liable, plaintiff's must show it to be an accepted governmental practice under Monell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Pape in 1961, the Supreme Court said no, but the justices changed their mind seventeen years later in Monell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
As a practical matter, though, the outcome may have turned on pleading failures on the plaintiff’s part: She did not present sufficient facts to support her assertion that his misconduct had a nexus to employment, or to establish that the tortfeasor was, in fact, a supervisor (Garnett v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]