Search for: "US v. Nixon" Results 81 - 100 of 1,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Dominion Voting Systems had sued Fox in the US, seeking a whopping US$1.6 billion damages. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:51 pm by Sophia Tang
However, the evidence mistook Nixon Peabody LLP (US) for Nixon Peabody CWL (HK). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Mykhailo Soldatenko
Charter “to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine[.] [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am by Josh Blackman
Or more precisely, this argument echoes the position raised in Walter Nixon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
“Less than a week before the 50th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Nixon understands that most Quakers deem the carrying of firearms inconsistent with their commitment to peace, but she reads scripture to permit the use of deadly force when strictly necessary in self-defense or justified defense of others. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]