Search for: "US v. Nunez" Results 81 - 100 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
Justice Scalia dissented from both dispositions, joined by the Chief Justice and Justice Thomas, in Nunez v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am by Susan Brenner
Nunez, 167 Ariz. 272, 278, 806 P.2d 861, 867 (1991). [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
In the US the notion dates from a judge’s broad statement in Haelen Laboratories v Topps Chewing Gum, 1953 litigation involving baseball cards. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am by Peter J. Sluka
Second, courts also held that “[t]o be entitled to an equitable accounting, a claimant must demonstrate that he or she has no adequate remedy at law” (Unitel Telecard Distribution Corp. v Nunez, 90 AD 3d 568 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
Fourth, “[t]o be entitled to an equitable accounting, a claimant must demonstrate that he or she has no adequate remedy at law” (Unitel Telecard Distribution Corp. v Nunez, 90 AD 3d 568 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
  Two circuits - the Third and Seventh - reached a contrary result, but the Seventh Circuit in Nunez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]