Search for: "US v. Patrick Brown" Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:01 pm
Hard Law Horatia Muir Watt (Sciences Po), General Course: Frontiers and Distributions: Discourse on the Methods of Private International LawBurkhard Hess (Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law), The Private-Public Law Divide in International Dispute ResolutionMichael Karayanni (Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem), The Private International Law of Class Actions Alan Scott Rau (Univ. of Texas), The Proper Allocation of Power Between Arbitral Tribunals and CourtsAndrés Rodríguez-Benot… [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sasha Volokh
Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application ¶ 227, at 226 (4th ed. 2013); Patrick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
Holder), narrowed the use of race in redistricting (Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by Mark Flanagan, Patrick Carome and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Hale. * GitHub Letter. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” KTSP reports on the story behind Murr v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
”   Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:32 am by Jani Ihalainen
What amounts to a groundless threat is not entirely clear under all of the provisions above (which act fairly similarly to each other), however the High Court endeavored to answer this at the cusp of the 21st century.The case of Brain v Ingledew Brown Bennington & Garrett (No 3), decided in 1997, dealt with Patrick John Brain, who, in the early 90s, set up a consulting business in an effort to exploit new technologies and inventions all over the world,… [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon The National Labor Relations Board’s decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., announced last week, dramatically expands joint employer liability under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Strassberg, Scrutinizing Polygamy: Utah’s Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
On the first point, the judge referred to the Court of Appeal in Patrick John Brain v Ingledew Brown Bennison & Grant [1996] FSR 341 as authority for the principle that the cause of action under Section 70(1) is available for such threats. [read post]