Search for: "US v. Pineda" Results 81 - 100 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Kevin
However, invariably judges will be asked to interpret these regulations - and as a recent California court case shows, their decisions may be unsettling.In Pineda v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
Earlier this month, the DC Circuit exposed the flaws in the 9th’s logic in US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Greg Blankinship
Code, § 1747.08, a nearly identical statute, the California Supreme Court recently held in Pineda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:33 am
Barry Trupin, defendant-appellee NEW YORK COUNTYLabor LawIRCA Does Not Preclude Illegal Workers From Pursuing Claims to Recover Money for Work Already Performed Pineda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am by Steve Satterfield
  (The California Supreme Court reached this same conclusion interpreting a very similar statute in Pineda v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Shaun McParland Baldwin
  A rash of class action suits have been filed following a recent ruling by California Supreme Court in Pineda v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm by Craig Hoffman
”  However, in February 2011, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Pineda v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:37 am by Chip Merlin
Even in jury trials, the itemization of jury verdicts is far shorter than what the insurance companies are having their attorneys ask for in front of judges.A decision yesterday by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal, Pineda v. [read post]