Search for: "US v. Ronald A. Harris"
Results 81 - 100
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Earl Warren and the Struggle for Justice (Lexington Books, 2015, pp. 360), by Wilmington College political science professor Paul Moke. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am
If we now turn away from these things to re-embrace, as Ronald Reagan would say, the failed policies of the past, we'll get the failed results of the past. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
PERKINS & RONALD N. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
(See also Ronald D. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
The O’Brien holding was consistent with the decision in Harris v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to say that Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald London, and Lisa Beth Zycherman (all of Davis Wright Tremaine) and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker supporting the petition for certiorari in Dariano v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Federal Election Commission, Harris v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:28 pm
Advertising Week – Lights, Camera, and Action – New York lawyer Ronald Urbach of Davis & Gilbert on his blog, Madison Ave Insights Surviving a Trademark Opposition Challenge: Do You Have a True ‘Intent-to-Use’? [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
” At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen anticipates the Court’s decision – expected in the next few days – in Harris v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Ronald D. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm
In Town of Greece v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to David M. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Johns River Water Management District, in which the Court held that the government must show a nexus and rough proportionality between its demand on the landowner and the effects of the proposed land use whenever it engages in land-use regulation, while Ronald Mann analyzes the Court’s opinion in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
Painter (1950) and Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
Similarly, without Article V amendment, one could move to multi-member districts and reform gerrymandering practices.The Senate's filibuster and hold rules can be changed by a simple majority, or by the threat of using a simple majority in order to obtain 67 votes for more moderate measures. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
Cooey v. [read post]
