Search for: "US v. Sales"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Realty Corp., 55 AD3d 454, 454 [1st Dept 2008], affd 13 NY3d 573 [2009], cert denied 561 US 1006 [2010]). [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Markham notes that, under the major questions doctrine, articulated last year by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Exceptions to Fiduciary Advice: Sales Pitches and Investment Education As noted above, unlike its 2016 predecessor, the Final Rule does not provide a specific carveout for recommendations to sophisticated, independent advice recipients on the basis that the DOL believes it is preferable to utilize a facts-and-circumstances test for recommendations to plan sponsor fiduciaries absent an acknowledgment of fiduciary status with respect to the recommendation. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ripe red tomatoes for sale here. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
It cited the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow that the wording of the application as filed could be used to interpret the granted claims, but noted that this was irrelevant in 10x Genomics v Curio and therefore required no decision. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Professor Marc I. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Goodwin Procter LLP. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm
Surcharges are added to sale transactions by some retailers when the buyer uses a credit card to make a purchase. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
by Dennis Crouch I see the US Supreme Court’s 1912 decision in Henry v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:46 am
The Plimsouls v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 makes it “unlawful for any person . . . to use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security . . ., any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the SEC may prescribe. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Basic v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:19 pm
You can call us at 630-333-0333 or contact us online. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
General guidance on confidentiality: the Fujifilm v Kodak decision, LD Düsseldorf, UPC_CFI_355/2023, 27 March 2024 In these proceedings, the defence to infringement was based on a prior use argument deriving from an acquisition in 2017. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:36 pm
Is your M&A target a manufacturing company with automated production, a consumer products business with online sales and marketing or an education company that creates content for students? [read post]
