Search for: "USA v. Arthur" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:48 am by Layma Ahmadzai
Also in the National Law Journal, Arthur Woodard has an opinion piece in which he examines last Term’s decision in Conkright v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Arthur Amaral, 50, of Middleboro, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, 38, of Norton, pled guilty yesterday to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:59 am by Randall Reese
Asset Resolution was formed by Silar Advisors, L.P. to take title to assets that served as collateral for a $67 million loan to Compass USA SPE LLC, which was used by Compass to acquire the assets of USA Commercial Mortgage Company ("USACMC") in an earlier bankruptcy case through a section 363 sale. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Weymouth, MA; Anne Hilbert, President) Aerosoft Usa, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 8:37 am
Dadante    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08b0016n.06 In re: Arthur Boyd, Jr. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Mukasey    Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0436n.06 USA v. [read post]