Search for: "USA v. Certain Land"
Results 81 - 100
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:54 am
USA v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
The court all but did away with any semblance of a direct-to-consumer exception to the rule (the recognition of which landed the intermediate decision that Hamilton reversed in #-4 of our worst of2010). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Some major areas of concern for the JCHR: The Bill introduces a power to confer counter-terrorism functions on the National Crime Agency, provisions to make it exempt from freedom of information law, and to prevent strike action by Agency officials with operational powers; The Bill confers a power on the Lord Chancellor to lift the ban on filming and broadcasting of court proceedings – the JCHR is concerned that this power may discourage certain vulnerable witnesses and victims from… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 8:21 pm
” Watson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that, in an attempt to look for precedents for the Act’s individual mandate, supporters of the law are looking to the Militia Act of 1792, which arguably required certain citizens to enter into commerce by purchasing military supplies. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Sea-Land Services, which involves issues related to compensation under the Longshore Act. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Kemp, supra, at 328-329; Crumbley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:19 pm
The important thing to know is that we only started keeping data on this country’s recessions in 1950… and we haven’t had anything but ‘V’ shaped recoveries since 1950. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses Douglas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
Ramos v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:54 pm
A similar issue arises with respect to certain temporary tax credits given to the very rich which are set to expire. [read post]
