Search for: "United States Response" Results 81 - 100 of 70,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2008, 1:38 pm
True to form, the SG has waived the right of the United States to file a response. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Norway International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 9, 1977, Date-Signed March 7, 1980, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING THE TREATY OF EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND NORWAY, SIGNED AT OSLO ON JUNE 9, 1977 96TH CONGRESS SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, August 10, 1979. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:10 am
The United States also provided its one-year follow-up response to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and filed its one-year follow-up response to the Committee Against Torture. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 7:00 am by Oriana Skylar Mastro
But the United States must work with India discreetly, because the more Indian efforts are tied to the United States, the more likely China is to react strongly and negatively. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
Many construction projects are subject to the federal Clean Water Act and its regulation of the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters of the United States, which the law defines simply as the "waters of the United States". [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:33 pm by Lawrence Solum
Caroline Mala Corbin (University of Miami School of Law) has posted Expanding the Bob Jones Compromise (MATTERS OF FAITH: RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCES AND LEGAL RESPONSES IN THE UNITED STATES, Austin Sarat, ed., Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This provision was included in the Treaty at the instance of the U.S. delegation in response to concerns over due process before special terrorism tribunals in Peru. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials: 2013-08-16 United States Complaint in Intervention 2013-08-16 United States Motion to Intervene 2013-08-16 Affidavit in Support of Motion to Intervene Exhibit A to Complaint 2012-08-12 Correspondence from Schneider Exhibit B to Complaint 1988-02-16 Correspondence from Tierney Exhibit C to Complaint 1997-05-30 State of Maine Response to Doi Prior post here. [read post]
9 May 2008, 11:30 am
I have recently distributed a memorandum entitled “A United Nations Proposal Defining Corporate Social Responsibility For Human Rights,” which discusses a report by a Special Representative to the U.N. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 11:52 am by Michael DelSignore
United States Supreme Court Blocks Vaccine or Test Rule Over the past few weeks, the Omicron variant of COVID-19 variant has exploded. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Katharine Van Tassel
Federalism, Policy Instruments, and Counter-Cyclical Responses to COVID-19 in the United States, SSRN: Federalism plays a foundational role in structuring public expectations about how... [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm by Immigration Prof
The Syrian Refugee Crisis: A Comparison of Responses by Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States by Nicole Ostrand, Journal of Migration and Human Security Executive Summary This paper looks at the burdens and costs of the Syrian... [read post]
However, the President insisted that a united response in the coming days is essential to the future of Europe. [read post]
However, the President insisted that a united response in the coming days is essential to the future of Europe. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 16, 1975. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:42 am by Altman & Altman
In Massachusetts and across the United States, ensuring workplace safety is a major responsibility for employers. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am by Cornell Library
Strikes down the Defense of Marriage Act: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_g2bh.pdf SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus UNITED STATES v. [read post]