Search for: "United States of America v. Goldsmith" Results 81 - 90 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
It includes not only active participants in hostilities but also anyone who "purposefully and materially" supported attacks on the United States or its allies -- language that arguably encompasses anyone who sent money to a banned group or food to a combatant son. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
, Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President (Basic Books). 2001. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Board of Education; Ely was less taken by the Court's ability to discern substantive values, but he did strongly believe that the duty to monitor the basic procedures of the republic and to engage in “representation reinforcement” to protect marginalized groups who could not in fact participate adequately in America’s system of interest-group politics (even if, as we have recently been reminded, he vociferously opposed Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am by Kenneth Anderson
The second article is a feature profile by Karen de Young of White House counterterrorism advisor John Brennan, “A CIA Veteran Transforms US Counterterrorism Policy” (October 24); Chesney and Jack Goldsmith each comment on it at Lawfare. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
I’ve refrained so far from commenting on the Liz Cheney — AQ7 ad, but I want to make one lengthy statement on it and, I hope, leave it at that. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]