Search for: "United States v. 6 DEVICES, ETC."
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
In no particular order, below are some of my social media law predictions for 2012:1) Social Media account ownership issues will increase. 2) State Legislatures and/or the courts in the United States will address whether employees may be required to turn over their social media user names and passwords and/or install social media monitoring software onto their personal electronic devices so employers may access their employees' private electronic… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
The Commission first determined that the ALJ’s invalidity analysis for the ‘647 patent erroneously relied upon the ‘647 patent’s alleged use of the term “structure,” rather than an agreed-upon construction by the parties, namely, “an instance of a pattern, where a ‘pattern refers to data, such as grammar, regular expression, string, etc., used by a pattern analysis unit to recognize information in a document, such as dates, addresses,… [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
It is apparent from the Statement of Objects and Reasons for introducing section 438 in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 that it was felt imperative to evolve a device by which an alleged accused is not compelled to face ignominy and disgrace at the instance of influential people who try to implicate their rivals in false cases. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2701; and Ranjit Thakur v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
But not every manufacturer took that as an opportunity to keep from compensating the composers that made their devices so valuable to the public. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am
: Telstra & Anor v Phone Directories Co & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Canada The daily digital lock dissenter, day 8: Documentary Organisation of Canada (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 7: Canadian Civil Liberties Association (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 6: Canadian Federation of Students (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 5: Canadian Teachers’ Federation (Michael Geist) Canada proposes (another)… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on April 17, 1889. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
His device was called a hydrosphygmograph. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
As we said, the object of granting the concessional rate of duty was to protect the smaller units in the industry from the competition by the larger ones and that object would have been frustrated, if, by adopting the device of fragmentation, the larger units could become the ultimate beneficiaries of the bounty. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
For operators of freight-hauling trucks, the maximum size which may be driven without a CDL is Class 6 (maximum 26,000 pounds gross vehicle weight). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Thus, for example, the U.N Charter’s provision against the use of force is binding international law on all States and it, in turn, is binding law in the United States, for example, and on its citizens. (6) Treaties are analogous to “contracts” in the domestic legal system. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
§112, ¶6. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:16 am
Brian Peterson posts on a fascinating West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals decision involving the use of social media between a juror and defendant and the issue of disclosure of such connections during voir dire.In State v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
