Search for: "United States v. American Sales Corporation" Results 81 - 100 of 711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
McNamara secured the first race discrimination verdict in the United States against a real estate franchise for failure to award a sales agency to an African-American in Tyler v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
"--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 6/3/09Cite: American Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Superior Court; the defendant knew that Agusta sold its helicopter throughout the United States, and that it had an American subsidiary - since SNFA's ball bearings were custom-made, Agusta's distributors essentially were SNFA's American distribution arm. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 2:17 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ConnecticutOpinion Date: 11/12/09Cite: Drummond American LLC v. [read post]