Search for: "United States v. Atkins" Results 81 - 100 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am by Christine Corcos
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
There is still the hole they left when they decided Atkins, and again when they decided Hall v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm by Kate Howard
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
United States Gawker Media has filed for bankruptcy after losing the Hulk Hogan invasion-of-privacy case. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
The United States Supreme Court this morning took up two capital cases from Texas, Moore v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel Rigsby, 15-513, has its origins in Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
Trademark applicants in China have an additional “offensive” option not available in the United States. [read post]
It is this distinction between the two systems (that of the United States and other common law countries like England and Australia and Canada versus China and other civil law countries like Germany, Japan, Korea, and France) that so often trips up American and British companies. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 15-245Issue: Whether the district court has jurisdiction to expunge an individual’s criminal record on equitable grounds. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Texas 15-65Issue: Whether Texas’s standard for determining if a capital defendant meets the second prong of the definition of intellectual disability (“deficits in adaptive functioning”) violates the Eighth Amendment in light of Atkins v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:12 am by Ron Coleman
V Secret, (2) clarifying the standard of proof needed to establish federal dilution of a famous trademark, (3)confirming that dilution can be established through blurring, and (4) defining “fame” as being “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States,” which would eliminate niche market fame. [read post]