Search for: "United States v. Bartlett"
Results 81 - 100
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Rather, the Court stated that “Section 10(b) reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:35 am
Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
The plaintiff in Arters asserted a “design defect”/“remove from the market” claim à la Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Venard had signed as a condition of his membership with the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association (USHPA). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
In Llorca v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
Bartlett, and Virginia argued Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
United States, 447 F. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:59 pm
Greenaway, Jr., previously of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and currently serving on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:22 am
Perhaps most notable are changes made to account for the Second Circuit’s 2018 decision (in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
There’s good language in Bartlett (2013 #+1) [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
But that only turns state corporate courts – and Delaware courts in particular – into a secondary regulator for the United States. [read post]
