Search for: "United States v. Berlin"
Results 81 - 100
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Conclusion The potential impact of any judgment of the CJEU on the exportability of these benefits, and its interpretation by the Supreme Court remains to be seen, but it is another case raising the pertinent issue of free movement and social security in Europe (see the recent CJEU judgment in Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa, Sonita, Valentina and Valentino Alimanovic (C-67/14). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
§ 1498 (that statute has been used by private parties to establish that they cannot be held liable for infringement for any goods “used or manufactured by or for the United States”). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
On April 18, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 does not authorize lawsuits against entities such as corporations, states, or political groups. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:12 am
The associations alleged that fully paid retiree health insurance was a vested benefit protected by the Contracts Clause of the United States and California Constitutions. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 pm
On June 18, 2010, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered final judgment in the matter of Elisa Nili Cirilo Peres Ben-Rafael, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:30 am
The live streaming is being made available pursuant to Article 10.21.2 of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
United States ,1944 An article in the Washington Post on court nominees refusing to answer questions about Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:39 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The court took note of the pending United States Supreme Court review in Ex Parte Medellin (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) 223 S.W.3d 315, cert. granted Apr. 30, 2007, sub nom. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 4:10 pm
In the matter Olivia Rux et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:59 am
After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
An example of the FSIA piercing the this immunity is the decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Malewicz v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 1:45 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explains in great detail and much clarity why the commercial exception claimed by the plaintiff does not apply, even considering the fact that the Eurail pass was purchased in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, partner, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:32 pm
In it, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit highlights differences in the construction of the act by several courts with regard to various types of positions often filled by local hires. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
When the commission ruled for Germany, the heirs went to federal court in the United States, arguing that the art had been taken in violation of international law. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:39 pm
And there in the heart of Berlin, mere yards from the din of Unter den Linden, the courtyard of the old Prussian State Library beckons. [read post]
