Search for: "United States v. Boots"
Results 81 - 100
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm
State of North Carolina, No. 13-604, Supreme Court of the United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm
State of North Carolina, No. 13-604, Supreme Court of the United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
Even the United States Supreme Court, I've discovered, has called it the "California District Court of Appeals," and has done so a half-dozen times. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
§ 437g(a)(8)(A), which states that "Any party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party ... may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:03 pm
Furthermore, he has apparently franchised the NAKED COWBOY name to exhibitionists in other cities across the United States for about $5,000 per year (money well spent, I’m sure). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Boerne v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
And in the context of this diversity, the United States has not been striven by religious civil wars. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Remarkably, the Court has only focused on this substantive question at all in one case, Burns v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 11:36 am
The legal reasoning is coherent.Yet there's still something about this opinion that just seems wrong.I'm not a huge fan of unregulated machine guns floating around the United States, so I get why ATF wants to know when an existing machine gun -- created before they were banned -- gets transferred. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
This lawsuit is no different, except, sadly, it involves the President of the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 8:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
The jury found Australian Leather and its owner Eddie Oygur willfully infringed the “UGG” mark when the Australian company sold 12 pairs of sheepskin boots brandishing the mark to customers in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Many years ago in Whren v United States, 517 US 806 (1996), the United States Supreme Court upheld the use of pretext based traffic stops. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:20 am
The case is Ugglebo Clogs, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
United States: Two new lawsuits, filed in Connecticut and New York, challenging the Defense of Marriage Act now offer the president a chance to put the government on the side of justice. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
