Search for: "United States v. Bristol"
Results 81 - 100
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
In the United States, rebates are negotiated by PBMs, whose function is to define formularies on behalf of health insurers. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:52 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
May 28, 2008); United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
ISI has does business and has offices throughout the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
(quoting Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 8:36 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb P.R., Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:11 am
Corporate lawyers » United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 6:48 am
Fisher here: State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
Bristol-Myers, 137 S. [read post]
