Search for: "United States v. Brown" Results 81 - 100 of 4,465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Dunning School, Historical Error, and Oral Argument in Anderson v. Griswold
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Illegal Reentry into Texas: Crimes Under Federal Statute and Texas Law
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog - http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog
Supreme Court raises broad questions about Colorado ruling on Trump
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Takeaways from the Supreme Court oral arguments on the Trump 14th Amendment case
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“It’s by the chief justice of the United States a year after the 14th Amendment,” Kavanaugh said in a reference to Chase. [read post]
J&Y Personal Injury Blog - https://jnylaw.com/blog/
"I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be President of the United States."
8 Feb 2024, 1:00 pm
"Said Justice Elena Kagan in today's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Althouse - https://althouse.blogspot.com
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the most interested questioner on whether the presidency was an "Office under the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738 (1974) (as applied to candidates for President and Congress); Jenness v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738 (1974) (as applied to candidates for President and Congress); Jenness v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Charles Wilkinson on the History of the Boldt Decision
7 Feb 2024, 3:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Like Brown v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - https://turtletalk.blog/
[Jonathan H. Adler] DOJ Files Writ of Mandamus to End Juliana Climate Litigation
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Guest Post: Year in Review: 2023 Key Management and Professional Liability Insurance Coverage Decisions
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
In Brown Goldstein Levy LLP v. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
CELEBRATING BLACK HISTORY MONTH: Thurgood Marshall
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am by GSU Law Student
United States Courts. [read post]
The Blackacre Times - http://theblackacretimes.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
§2383, which covers participation in rebellion or insurrection, and which provides that those found guilty "shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/