Search for: "United States v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" Results 81 - 100 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
City of San Diego (Cal. 1983), the San Diego charter provided that employee and city contributions to the retirement fund would be “computed upon the basis of actuarial advice designed to estimate the funding needed to accrue a guaranteed retirement allowance upon retirement. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 For example, few would say that the State of California is attempting to convey a religious message by retaining the names given to many of the State’s cities by their original Spanish settlers—San Diego, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, San Jose, San Francisco, etc. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The San Diego Union-Tribune, Denise Harle maintains that “all Americans should consider it great news that the Supreme Court is taking a hard look at the Reproductive FACT Act” in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:49 am by JJS
Another California city, San Diego, may find comfort in the City of Vallejo district court opinion, and utilize the bankruptcy code to re-work its pension obligations. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:11 pm
Specifically, the government alleged anticompetitive effects in eight relevant geographic markets for the sale of sliced bread: Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, and San Francisco in California; Kansas City, Kansas; Omaha, Nebraska; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and the Harrisburg/Scranton area in Pennsylvania.Under the proposed consent decree, which is subject to court approval, the companies must divest the rights to sell Sara Lee’s… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:01 pm by Steven Dawson
  The Court found, in a 2-1 decision, that in 2020, the United States District Court for California, Southern District (San Diego) had abused its discretion when it enjoined the State of California from enforcing AB-5 against motor carriers doing business in California (on the ground that such enforcement was preempted by F4A) (our prior article on the District Court’s ruling can be read here). [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
San Diego NORML, et al.; San Bernardino County, et al., v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
That same day, the County of San Diego adopted a new policy: a limited number of people could meet in houses of worship so long as they comply with certain social distancing guidance. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public… [read post]