Search for: "United States v. Certain Parcels of Land"
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Rptr. 331 (1988) ("At issue on this appeal is whether, by virtue of the so-called California Tidelands Trust Doctrine, the State and its successor in interest, the City, can assert an easement for commerce, navigation and fishery over land which was part of a Mexican land grant and patented by the United States government pursuant to the Act of 1851. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
But the state appeals court disagreed and ruled that the two parcels should be considered as one; if the parcels are viewed together, the siblings were not deprived of all of the value of their land – a requirement for a taking. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:06 am
Indian law observers are familiar with the case by now: Dollar General leased a parcel of tribal land from a tribal entity to operate a store on the reservation. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
High Sierra Rural Alliance v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
In 2010, the real parties applied for a design permit, planned development permit (PDP), tentative map, general plan amendment, and rezoning to build 40 residential units on the parcel. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Furthermore, subsequent zoning actions may be relevant to both land value and damages, or special benefits. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
United States, 30 Fed. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
CEQA Caselaw and Wildfire Issues Clews Land & Livestock, LLC. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Specifically, this law exempts certain developments with 100% affordable housing on land owned by an independent institution of higher education or a religious institution from CEQA review. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:35 am
Vermont North Properties v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
The City of Austin took a parcel of land in downtown that was, in short order, folded into a private development. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
