Search for: "United States v. Chaires"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
” If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
FTC Chair Lina M. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Overall, 136,782 PDFs and 3,657,447 pages were prepared for addition to Law Library digital collections, including the United States Congressional Serial Set, Legal Reports (Publications of the Law Library of Congress), and Foreign Legal Gazettes. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
Mass.) in Steiner v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
In short, it is now black-letter law in the United States that personal information can only be collected for disclosed and contextually relevant purposes. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Resolutn. 2nd Chair. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Something to bear in mind regarding this class action on behalf of everyone in the United States whose blood contains 0.05 parts per trillion or more of per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—a class that comprises everyone in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
At the same time, critics of the administrative state have called into question authority of administrative agencies to adjudicate claims in light of Article III’s command that “[t]he judicial power of the United States shall be vested” in courts. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Ayer Chair in Business Law and Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
In a statement explaining the rationale for the Council’s revised approach, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who chairs the FSOC, argued that the Interpretive Guidance “eliminates several prerequisites to designation in place under the [2019 Interpretive Guidance] that were not contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Act and that are based on a flawed view of how financial risks develop and spread. [read post]
