Search for: "United States v. Chestnut" Results 81 - 100 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 5:43 am
Janet Bond Arterton United States District Judge United States District Court District of Connecticut Richard C. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 1:07 pm
It appears that European courts are less tolerant of bullying record industry lawyers than in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
It assumes there is a "making available" right in the United States, which even the RIAA knows is not so -- as evidenced by its removal of that theory from its complaints once Judge Brewster held that its complaint fails to state a claim in Interscope v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:25 am
Zomba, a case challenging as unconstitutional an award of statutory damages in an amount that is 44 times the amount of actual damages, a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has been filed. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
Thomas, on the issue of unconstitutionally excessive statutory damages, a petition for certiorari has been filed with the United States Supreme Court.The petition maintains that a statutory damages award which is 44 times the actual damages is unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Thomas, the United States Department of Justice has filed a brief defending the constitutionality of the $9250-per-song-file jury verdict, in opposition to Ms. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
United Cerebral Palsy has put together a Resource Guide to help locate the needed assistance in Delaware. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:07 am
United States, a case involving the interplay between multiple federal criminal statutes, state law treatment of convicted offenders, and interpretive chestnuts such as the Absurd Results canon. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:32 am
” The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has an interesting opinion out that details the applicable standards for determining whether a particular death is accidental for these purposes, and finding that an insured’s death after driving while intoxicated does not qualify. [read post]