Search for: "United States v. City of Berkeley"
Results 81 - 100
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
(That is why Alabama could not impose tax or regulatory burdens on people who chose to provide services to the federal civil rights agencies, and also why the City of Berkeley cannot punish entities that assist the federal government in building a border wall by disqualifying them from doing business with the City.) [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
(Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 776; Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
It did so on the basis of its allegation that the listing mechanism violated the California and United States Constitutions. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
City of Berkeley (2015) 60 Cal. 4th 1086, 1105 ….) [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:55 am
” In a recent case, Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:24 am
By the time the Court decided Forsyth County v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
” (Quoting Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
” (Quoting Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
In Talley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
To begin with, the A.G. had two databases about mass shootings in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
After the jump are the panels sponsored by the Law and History CRN a next week's annual meeting in Mexico City. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am
City of St. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Further, “CEQA forbids ‘piecemeal’ review of the significant environmental impacts of a project” (quoting Berkeley Keep Jets Over The Bay Com. v. [read post]
