Search for: "United States v. Damon" Results 81 - 100 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:25 am by Rachel Sachs
Writing at Reason, Damon W. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Statistics show the imposition of the death penalty has sharply declined in the Lone Star state over the past two decades. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 12:57 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, the notorious 1944 decision that upheld the World War II-era racially-based internment of over 100,000 Japanese-Americans. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that a criminal defendant whose assets have been frozen before his trial has no right to a pre-trial hearing to challenge the probable cause for his indictment, even if he needs the frozen funds to pay for his defense. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason, Damon Root notes that Timbs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:27 am
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (government invited public recreational boaters to enter a private lagoon) (a case litigated by my Damon Key colleagues Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert, by the way), Loretto v. [read post]