Search for: "United States v. Davidson"
Results 81 - 100
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Eliezer Lazo, Case No. 11-20447-Cr-Altonaga; United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Eliezer Lazo, Case No. 11-20447-Cr-Altonaga; United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 7:33 am
Similarly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Philip Davidson told the Senate Armed Service Committee on March 9 that the “greatest danger the United States and [its] allies face in the region is the erosion of conventional deterrence vis-à-vis the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:48 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson City, the United States Supreme Court considered the scope of Title VII protections from retaliation for employees who act as witnesses in an employer's internal investigation into harassment. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
HD is the registered owner of the SCREAMIN’ EAGLE trademark for clothing in the United States and other countries but does not have such a registration in Canada. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
On Saturday at 6 p.m., C-SPAN Radio will air the 1974 oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
Also in the news: YouTube rolls out its anticipated Copyright Match tool, copyright collecting societies in Kenya continue to struggle with accountability, and China launches an IPR awareness campaign.Lady Liberty "faceswap" will cost the United States Postal Service $3.5MBetween 2011 and 2014, the United States Postal Service (USPS) used an image of the Statue of Liberty for its Forever Stamp series (a type of First Class postage stamp). [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Greenmoss, supra (alteration in original) (quoting Harley–Davidson Motorsports, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
European Community, in which the Court is considering whether and to what extent RICO applies outside the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
Davidson, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Accordingly, we reverse Davidson Benedict v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Pierce v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
