Search for: "United States v. Democratic Executive Committee"
Results 81 - 100
of 501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Despite the fact that neither Congress nor DOJ has yet taken steps sufficient to disqualify Trump from holding federal office, he might nevertheless be constitutionally ineligible to hold any future state or federal office, including the presidency, by virtue of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that states cannot execute mentally handicapped people. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:52 am
Sawyer, versus the unilateralist vision of the president as “the sole organ of our Nation in foreign affairs” trumpeted by Justice George Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
It's possible that many of the lawmakers who voted against the proposal simply didn't want their state, with not even a million inhabitants, to take such a fundamental decision against two of the country's largest and most powerful companies.There definitely is broadbased political support for the fight against app store monopolies: last fall, the Democratic majority of the United States House of Representatives adopted a report on digital markets… [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
At the end of 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:04 am
Trump's 19 March Executive Order--Removing Discrimination and Discriminatory Equity Ideology From the Foreign Service (Presidential Actions). [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
")) August 19, 2024 Remarks by President Biden During Keynote Address at the Democratic National Committee Convention | Chicago, IL10:27 P.M. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
That has already been made clear in the United States, where members of the Republican Party vowed to take countermeasures. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:25 am
United States, which struck down part of a statute that “imposes sentencing enhancements on repeat offenders who commit crimes with guns. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
