Search for: "United States v. Democratic Executive Committee" Results 81 - 100 of 675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm by Steve Hall
Martin O’Malley’s administration last month withdrew its proposed lethal-injection protocols from a General Assembly committee, saying further review was required because a drug used in the executions — sodium thiopental — is no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This latter category included countries like Brazil, India, Poland, Ukraine, the Philippines, Turkey, and the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
 ‘Rocky’ shock for China makes Trump Hong Kong heroThis post includes the text of the latest response of the government of the United States, the President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization, issued 14 July 2020, reproduced below. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:06 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Rohini Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
McGahn might appear at a congressional hearing, but, for the reasons explained below, he would not provide any new information or answer any of the questions the Democrats want answered. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The nexus between state, CPC and United Front through the CPPCC, then, serves as the connective tissue between CPC and State constitutions, and between the political authority of the CPC and its exercise through the rule system, it itself has mandated as its own political line. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
Lobbying the executive branch, for example, is not considered lobbying for tax purposes and so is not subject to the lobbying limits. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Soren Dayton, Erica Newland
We explain these procedures below but first offer a brief explanation of how the war powers provisions of the NSRAA would regulate the United States’ engagement in hostilities abroad. [read post]