Search for: "United States v. Doe Co."
Results 81 - 100
of 9,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co.,… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
United States, 579 U.S. 162, 170 (2016). [3] Oral Arg. at 00:21–00:54, Sumitomo Pharma Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The first panel, “Breakthrough Verdicts: Legal Decisions Shaping the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals,” will discuss landmark rulings and regional perspectives from Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia, Africa, Europe, and the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
” Finally, in last week’s United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
State Auto. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am
§ 30501, et seq. [2] Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
