Search for: "United States v. Fee"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
If you want (or need) a roadmap, and powerful quotes by the Ninth Circuit, to help you avoid getting your requested fee award slashed by the district court, here it is.You're welcome. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
ELIA CONSTRUCTION CORP., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:54 pm
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:02 am
United States, No. 2011-1032 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Michel V. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
Detroit Board of Education, upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring public sector employees covered by a collective bargaining unit to pay agency fees to the union, even when they chose not to be a part of the bargaining unit. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
Detroit Board of Education, upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring public sector employees covered by a collective bargaining unit to pay agency fees to the union, even when they chose not to be a part of the bargaining unit. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
United States, 509 U.S. 602 (1993). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
In Muniz v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:05 am
See Walton, United States Trustee v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
Those fees are, in the United States, generally deductible as an “ordinary and necessary” business expense. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:57 pm
s passport from the United States Marshals on Mr.Font Paulus's behalf and verified that Ms. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
We will be following the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
Quinn, 573 U.S. __ (2014), the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to four ruling struck down an Illinois regulatory framework that required personal assistants (PAs) for Medicaid recipients to pay agency fees to the union. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]
