Search for: "United States v. Feinstein"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm
At the same time, the United States recognizes that collecting information in bulk may not result in the collection of information about persons whose activities are not of interest to the Intelligence Community. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
United States, 408 U.S. 606, 624 (1972) (“committee reports are protected”); id. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Jan. 7, 2014), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered that Danny Garber, Kenneth Yellin, and Jordan Feinstein (collectively, “Defendants”) produce their complete individual tax returns. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
Dianne Feinstein and Rep. [read post]
9 May 2014, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the case of Huerta v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
The contours of that right are not clear, but they do not protect a former Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn who lost his job after the DA learned that his father was running for office against a State Senator who was being prosecuted by his office.The case is Sharpe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
United States: Supreme Court Review of Federal Statute Authorizing Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:36 am
” Ben also endorses the idea that NSA ought be given statutory authority to continue surveillance on targets when they first enter the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
The court starts with the plaintiffs’ statutory argument—which runs headlong into the United States’ general immunity from suit. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Feinstein). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:52 pm
Right now, the United States Congress is facing a fundamental decision about how it will handle mass surveillance confirmed by the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 2:08 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
“Today’s Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
