Search for: "United States v. Felix" Results 81 - 100 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am by Peter Margulies
This subsection’s language permits return to “contiguous” countries that share a border with the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1911) through the mid-twentieth century, with decisive roles played by Justices Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:41 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, 328 U.S. 582, 597 (1946) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Cowlitz tribe entered into failed treaty negotiations with the United States in 1855, but according to the DOI and the D.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:30 am
United States, the court considered whether a taxpayer could bring a tax-refund suit in a federal district court if he did not first pay all of the taxes sought by the Treasury. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:47 am by Sarah M Donnelly
 He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:48 pm
" [www.theatlantic.com]     The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti By Felix Frankfurter March 1927 Judge Felix Frankfurter offers an in-depth look at what went wrong in the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti [www.theatlantic.com]     Looking Back at Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm by Guest
By 1941, the pro-New Deal Court took this line, saying in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am by Ronald Collins
With that all said, here are fifteen new or forthcoming works on the Supreme Court:  Erwin Chemerinsky, The Case Against the Supreme Court  Richard Davis, Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age  Garrett Epps, American Justice 2014: Nine Clashing Visions on the Supreme Court  Lewis L. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]