Search for: "United States v. Field"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 2:31 am
Fields Famous Brands, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
Here is the abstract:Federal judges have struggled mightily to comprehend the meaning and impact of the Supreme Court's landmark sentencing decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This paper argues that the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in FEC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
Not so for the United States—which fielded especially skeptical waiver questions from two judges on the panel. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 11:03 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
At Monday’s oral arguments in ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 9:25 am
United States, No. 03cv02414 (D.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:31 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a Memorandum Opinion in Fields v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:36 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
Here the courts in England and Wales were struggling to ascertain the intended meaning of clauses of a licence intended to take effect in the United States, where the gap between a brand's profile-raising strategy for football (a.k.a. soccer) apparel and the manner of its execution could be measured in light years. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:46 am
At the beginning of August 2009 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:41 am
After that, it is possible to identify Jones v Saudi Arabia. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:36 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
United States got his students to the line at 3:30 a.m., behind only four other people. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:46 pm
This case is a response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
(Eugene Volokh) See United States v. [read post]