Search for: "United States v. George Harris" Results 81 - 100 of 274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Jeff Carroll
By contrast, Benesh noted that every time a United States President makes a big decision, it eats away at his public approval rating. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
Finally, in June, the court declined to review Alabama’s law banning abortions in which the fetal body is dismembered for extraction, in Harris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
What were the original intentions of the framers of the United States Constitution? [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am by Terry Hart
The good news is that, for the most part, the legal framework both in the United States and internationally recognizes these principles. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am by Brian Shiffrin
  The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ryan Scoville
And while the restrictions may reflect a new approach to congressional foreign travel on the part of the Trump administration, that’s not obviously the case: Harris quotes Lynch as saying that members had “far greater access” under Presidents Barack Obama and George W. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]