Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Square Pegs and Round Holes by Chimene I. Keitner (cross-posted at Opinio Juris)

5 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm by Ethan Leib

Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]

PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/

E.D.Tex.: No standing to challenge search of mother's house where not a guest at time

6 Mar 2012, 1:34 am

United States v. [read post]

FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1

Could fishing companies upset a boatload of federal agencies with their Supreme Court challenge?

3 May 2023, 5:36 am by Marcia Coyle

A group of commercial fishing companies soon will have the opportunity to persuade the Supreme Court of the United States to do what big business has failed to achieve for decades: to drive a hole in the federal regulatory apparatus that could affect a broad swath of American lives. [read post]

Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog

The anemic spending power of the States

9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm

United States, 541 U.S. 600 (2004) [read post]

PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/

SoL tolling when pertinent public records are available to the plaintiff, but are tainted with fraud: Hooks v Samson Lone Star LP (Tex. Jan 30, 2015)

7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO

Mooney v. [read post]

Texas Causes of Action Blawg - http://causeofactionelements.blogspot.com/

Plugging Holes in Whistle Blowing Regimes--The SEC Moves to Protect its Own Turf

7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm

(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) I have been considering whistle blower statutes and the cultures they give rise to within structures of economic regulation in the United States. [read post]

Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/

In a felon-in-possession case (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)), a person charged in a single count with possessing a firearm on two separate dates, during a six-day period, isn’t entitled to an instruction that the jury “must agree unanimously on a particular date or dates on which he possessed a firearm.” Rather, possession of a firearm “is a continuing offense,” so the jury only needs to find “unanimously that the defendant possessed the firearm at any point” during period of the alleged possession. United States v. Estevez, No. 17-4159-cr, 2020 WL 3022983 (June 5, 2020).

10 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by Darrell Fields

United States v. [read post]

Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/

Orthopedic Surgery Expert Witness Allowed In Part

27 Sep 2018, 1:23 pm by Steven Cohen

– United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – September 18th, 2018) involves a trip and fall claim. [read post]

Expert Witness Blog - http://www.expertwitnessblog.com/

District Court Strikes Down Graphic Tobacco Labeling Requirement

29 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm by Eugene Volokh

United States FDA (D.D.C. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com

Federal Court Rules California Board Quota Law Unconstitutional

18 May 2023, 12:15 am

Now, United States District Court Judge John A. [read post]

California Corporate & Securities Law - https://www.calcorporatelaw.com/

Thirty Days In The Hole?

22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis

Three days ago, the United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the federally-backed regime in Cafastan against the latest insurgent assault in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]

Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/

Tax Court Slams FLP Planning

4 Jun 2017, 1:17 pm by Patti Spencer

Supreme Court case (United States v. [read post]

Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation - http://www.pennsylvaniafiduciarylitigation.com/

Troubled Bridge over Waters

16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm by Buce

Frum may not have noticed that he is a tapping into a classic episode in United States Constitutional history. [read post]

Underbelly: A Journal of Soft Information - http://underbelly-buce.blogspot.com/

The fact a vehicle was broken down and not stopped does not alter officer's ability to order occupants out if safety is an issue

1 Aug 2007, 3:50 am

United States v. [read post]