Search for: "United States v. Hollingsworth"
Results 81 - 100
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
United States v Windsor challenges the denial of federal benefits for gay couples under the Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].As many as 17 states have filed amicus briefs in opposition to gay marriage. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
As millions of people eagerly await next week’s Supreme Court action in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
All of the amicus briefs have now been filed in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
Just as the Supreme Court is preparing for oral argument regarding the validity under the Equal Protection clause of same-sex marriage restrictions on the 26th (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
There is a chance that in the second case (Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Mulkey (and indeed to the odd disposition of the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 3:53 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:32 am
On the following day, March 27th, the Court will conduct hearings on the second case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
The following day, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:57 am
United States v. [read post]
