Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 81 - 100
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2016, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, currently pending in the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
This discriminates against interstate commerce. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Co., 96 U.S. 1 (1877), the court held that Congress could regulate telegraph communication as part of its powers to regulate foreign and interstate "commerce. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:45 am
Thus, because they sold unregistered securities through the United States mail or interstate commerce these defendants were liable unless they could prove an exemption. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019).* * * C. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
They may, however, violate the Dormant Commerce Clause, which generally prevents States from “discriminat[ing] against interstate commerce” or “favor[ing] in-state economic interests over out-of- state interests,” if they fail to similarly address out-of-state and domestic products. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 12:24 pm
On April 30, 2018, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari filed in North Coast Railroad Authority v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
As we reported here on September 18, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that couriers providing deliveries for customers of GrubHub were not involved in interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am
July 15, 2022) (Jacobs, J.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined to impose “scheme liability” under subsections (a) and (c) of the Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
