Search for: "United States v. Jordan"
Results 81 - 100
of 903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 1:20 pm
District Judge Adalberto Jordan's decision of September 29 in Langbehn v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:00 pm
United States, No. 13:15-cv-00124 (S.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:25 pm
United States, U.S., No. 09-837, 1/11/11). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:18 am
United States, 497 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1974), was itself wrongly decided. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am
United States, scheduled for consideration at today’s Conference. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
The 11th Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 9:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:45 am
United States and thus whether the statute is void for vagueness. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
See United States Football Leaguev. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm
Although the panel was unanimous, the case produced three opinions — an opinion for the court by Judge Jordan and concurrences by Judges Rendell and Ambro, the latter of which expressly urges the Supreme Court to take up the case to provide further guidance on the proper interpretation of Missouri v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
At long last, the en banc 11th Circuit today decided United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:20 pm
Jordan E. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 2:47 pm
In its 1951 decision in Jordan v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:08 pm
United States, 135 S. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:38 am
This time it's United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:32 am
The en banc Court examined a federal statute that criminalizes the filing of retaliatory liens against "any officer or employee of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 10:07 am
Lewis (Intra-tribal Dispute; Jurisdiction) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlUpstate Citizens for Equality, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
The case was United States v. [read post]
