Search for: "United States v. Joshua" Results 81 - 100 of 636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Asylum seekers, Rwanda and the ECtHR On 14 June, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) granted an urgent interim measure in the case of KN v United Kingdom (no. 28774/22). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  For example, volume 2 includes The United States and International Law: From the Transcontinental Treaty to the League of Nations Covenant, 1819-1919, by Eileen P. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  But might So might one describe pre-2022 MLB as a form of “federalism” in which constituent units, each with their own measure of “sovereignty” were entitled to make their own rules, at least up to a point? [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Abortion rights organizations were apparently reluctant to raise enumerated powers objections to the law, perhaps because they objected to how such arguments had been used in prior cases (such as United States v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Antitrust law can address one consequence of systemic racism—disproportionately low levels of wealth for Black people compared to other groups in the United States—better than antidiscrimination law, Davis and his coauthors explain. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:03 am by jonathanturley
The serpent in this case, according to the defendants, was the United States government. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Here's the key language from the article:In the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States The BBC reports that Justin Bieber is dropping a $20 million (£16.2m) defamation lawsuit against two women who accused him of sexual assault. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Longan, Symposium on Ethics, Professionalism, and the Role of the Attorney General of the United States: Lessons from History, 72 Mercer L. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]