Search for: "United States v. Lerner"
Results 81 - 97
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 pm
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, 475 F.3d 824, 833 (7th Cir. 2007) ("[U]nder Rule 9(b) . . . the complaint 'must still afford a basis for believing that plaintiffs could prove scienter.'" (quoting DiLeo, 901 F.2d at 629)); Lerner v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
United States, the Court held that using sense-enhancing technology to obtain information about the interior of a home, even without a physical intrusion, constitutes a Fourth Amendment search, at least if the technology is not "in general public use. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
"Law reports in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(collectively Lilly), filed suit against all defendants for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,229,382 ('382 patent). [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
LAPINE, Defendant. 3:05cv1712(WWE) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 2008 U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Bey argues that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In DYSTAR TEXTILFARBEN GMBH v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
But one state judge held in September 2006 that it was unconstitutional, asserting in Graham v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
If the examination standards in the United States were not changing, we might expect successful applications in the United States by US inventors to grow at about the same rate as our measure of internationally important inventions originating in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
