Search for: "United States v. Li" Results 81 - 100 of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am by Michael DelSignore
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to issue landmark decisions early this summer regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a suspect's cell phone under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:04 pm by Mike Danko
  It allows suit to be filed against an airline in a U.S. court only if either: The passenger's ticket was issued in the United States; The passenger's journey was a round trip that started in the United States or was a one-way trip that ended in the United States;  The airline is incorporated in the United States;   The airline's principal place of business is in the United… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:30 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
As you may recall, MAO's were granted all the powers of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the right to bring suit for MSP recoveries lies only with the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 4:01 am by Antonios Baris
The meme featured the United States Capitol in the background with the cutline "FUND OUR MEMES!!! [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Because it was in financial difficulty, it sought new investment from the United States. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Michael O'Hear
 (7) [A] more practical solution to potential problems presented by a future sentencing proceeding lies closer at hand. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Last week, we filed on behalf of the Legion of Valor of the United States and the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation an amicus brief in the Stolen Valor Act case before the Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]