Search for: "United States v. Libby" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 3:18 pm
United States Leaves More Open Than it Answers PRIMARY MATERIALS Sentencing Memoranda Submitted in US v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
While I hate the Red Sox (but ironically love the Celtics), it is true that the tradition of anonymous speech is older than the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:09 pm
  Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
During a unit search on July 11, 2007, all of my writing paper wasconfiscated and all of Steve Champion's reference books were taken. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:58 pm
Assistant United States Attorney Russ Killinger made the announcement before the jury while standing under a ladder, holding an opened umbrella in one hand and a black cat in the other. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:47 pm
United States, which President Bush supported, and the President's decision to commute Scooter Libby's prison sentence. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
  Presumably the power exists partly to balance out the power of prosecutors gone wild, especially when they have gone wild on officers trying to carry out the foreign policy of the United States, albeit by way of cooking up a stupid story (apparently). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
" Ordinarily, courts decide for themselves what a statute means, after hearing from counsel on both sides; in the Libby case, Libby is on one side, the United States on the other; the President is not a party. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]